 This story was printed from TODAYonline | |
 | |
| What happened to those values? Weekend • July 12, 2008 news@newstoday.com.sg WHAT are our values as a nation? Do we even have shared values? Others do. Some countries turn to God to tell them how to feel about each other and everything. Others look to values grown over time. We Singaporeans have no shared God, no shared political ideology, no long-shared traditions, unless you count the military parade and fireworks on National Day. Even National Service is served by only a fraction of the country, men above 18. But while it’s safe to say no country has a set of values everybody cherishes, it’s still fair to think we could share some common beliefs and principles after about 200 years of living together. What could they be? (200 years? did you mean 1819? Singapore was still a fishing village back when Raffles founded it. I dont know how many years have Singaporeans been spending together, but I would take 1965 as a benchmark.) Many people point to the colour of our grass, which is greener. Our antecedents came here looking for a living, so it’s quite easy to think their children would be focused on the material world. They say, no wonder we so easily describe ourselves as “Singapore Inc”. (we are called "Singapore Inc." because the government operates the country like a business. if nothing is profitable, they won't care to do more. now you know why our government keep telling us that Singapore must not be a welfare state?) But for about 40 years now, we have had National Service. Every family sends its sons to combat training, where they risk their lives for something more than Hotel Singapore — there seems to be something worth fighting for, even worth killing for. What is it? (Worth fighting for...worth killing for...? it must be traumatizing if you realize that reality says otherwise. if you don't serve, you break the law and you go to jail. simple as that. what patriotism?) For many other countries that something is a way of life or just the nostrum: My motherland. But here, when we think roots, do we think Singapore? (yes of course, I think of paying more and more while getting paid less and less....oh and no retirement.) When people abroad ask me where I’m from, more than half the time they accept it when I say, “I’m from Singapore.” In my motherland though, 100 per cent of the time they still want to know, “Where are you from originally?” (I tell them, Kandang Kerbau Maternity Hospital.) If our shared values are hard to pin down, it’s not for lack of trying. On Jan 15, 1991, the world was told what Singapore’s “Shared Values” were, as the five statements of values were described after they were debated and adopted by Parliament. (the world was told? like as if they care or even know where Singapore is in 1991.) How deep have they sunk in? Why not have a look at the five values, listed here in bold type? (what 5 values? i will offer a $500 reward to the first average Singaporean walking in orchard road who can recite them) “Nation before community and society before self.” Well, a simple MRT or bus ride will be enough to show you how deeply we have embraced that one, with pregnant women, children and the old having to stand while even our boys in green sit, our youth pretend to sleep — what is it in the MRT aircon that makes so many people close their eyes for even a few stops? — and that’s not to mention the person in front of you at any building letting the door slam on you.(this land has become what the government has always envisaged to be: Singaporeans are not at fault, they just learned well from their government.) As for “Nation before community” — a phrasing that some say was added with the realisation that the original “community before self” could spell disaster in a multi-racial and multi-religious society — if we really believed in “nation before community”, why is there still a need for race-based self-help groups? (are you implying that the CDAC and Mendaki should be abolished? they have been taking over the government's abandoned responsibilities to offer basic welfare to its people over the years.) And so it goes with three of the other official “Shared Values”. Community support for the individual. Who knows what this means, and how it doesn’t contradict “Nation before community and society before self”? Family as the basic unit of society? What sounds so good and wholesome and very anodyne somehow found a downside in Singapore where people were actually punished for not forming a family — with a man at the head of the household. This kind of thinking led the Housing Board to deny our singles better grades of flats for the longest time. And for officialdom to deny medical benefits to children of female civil servants until more recent times – on the grounds that only a man could be considered the head of the home. Consensus, not conflict? Sure, on a daily basis, we avoid conflict but that’s more out of apathy and fear of trouble than a sense of consensus, which requires engagement, something we’re not renowned for. (apathy in Singaporeans does not lead from the lack of engagement. In Singapore, apathy is bred from helplessness. simply put in: Singaporeans know that whatever they do, they have no right, they have no say.(does this line sounds familiar?) every decision is discussed and finalized by the bureaucrats in their ivory tower. the only reason why the public are told to involved is probably to delude others that Singapore is democratic. where in actual fact, the decisions has already been made and "noises" need to be silenced. many Singaporeans has engaged the government in policy-making, but to say the very least, the government have not listened even once. thus, helplessness leads to apathy. our views are not going effect any changes so why bother?) Just look at the amount of conflict we pay to consume in pop culture. We enjoy every Die Hard and superhero Hollywood throws at us, and then generate swordfights and fistfights aplenty in homegrown shows. As they stand, it is hard to say we live by the official “Shared Values” or that society would accept laws that impose them, except for the one that says, “Racial and religious harmony” — we have even sent racist bloggers to jail to uphold it. (But we don’t discuss the terms on which we achieve harmony — acceptance or tolerance?) So then, what are our shared values? You could come up with limitless questions to help define values. How do the strong treat the weak? Where do we find joy? What moves our hearts? How do we feel about freedoms? Responsibilities? What will we fight for? (there are no shared values. the strong trample on the weak. the only joy is money and only money will move our hearts. there is no freedom and the only responsibilities is only towards one's family. we did not fight for anything as we are helpless lambs in the slaughterhouse. everyone is just an economic digit to the government and they have no wish to change that. this is Singapore Inc.) A lot to think about. If you think talking about it has any value. The writer is a media consultant who likes to share his views, if not values. | |
Profile
![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif)
interpretingsg- interpretingsg
Syndicate
